Showing posts with label Deception. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Deception. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Following The Money in Baby Lisa Case

Peter Hyatt wrote an excellent analysis on missing baby Lisa and her mother. Peter is an investigator with the State of Main and a premiere expert on statement analysis. Action, pattern of conduct, and behavior are all important factors in criminal cases. He writes a popular daily blog titled "www.Seamusoriley.blogspot.com covering many of the cases we see in the media.

"Statement Analysis is the scientific study of words seeking to discern truth from deception."

Deborah Bradley: Following the Money

1 month ago, 10 month old baby, Lisa Irwin was reported kidnapped by her parents.

Statement Analysis is one thing; money is another.

Statement Analysis concluded that:

Deborah Bradley was deceptive about what happened to Baby Lisa;
Lisa was never kidnapped.
Deborah Bradley has indicated that Lisa is dead.
Jeremy Bradley has been deceptive about what happened when he got home that night; covering for Deborah Bradley.
Jeremy Irwin has indicated that Lisa is dead.

They refused to allow the bedroom to be searched, but when it was, the odor of decomposition was there.

They refuse to be interviewed separately.

They have refused to have the boys interviewed, delaying until enough time has elapsed and the interviews so tainted that interviewing them would be meaningless.

They have reason to lie.
They have reason to not cooperate with police.
They have reason to hire defense attorneys. America gets this.

Follow the money.

If Deborah Bradley and Jeremy Irwin received, for example, $250,000 in "licensing agreements", it would explain a lot. Remember another killer mom that received more than a quarter of a million dollars for a few photos of her child? Receiving a big payout would explain:

1. "Wild Bill" Stanton's sensitive response to media about the $100,000 "reward" in which media, sensing that he would not give a straight answer, asked him plainly and he said, if someone brings "that kid" here, the $100,000 would be given.

2. Why it is that a $750 per hour attorney would come across the country to be part of a small case.

3. Why Jeremy Irwin would need to no longer work, when just one month ago, he couldn't pay his cell phones bill.

4. Why local media is ignored in exchange for national media, even though they claim she was kidnapped meaning she would likely be local;

5. Why Halloween was filmed by Good Morning America's crew.

Follow the money.

Let's say that a major network paid $250,000 in licensing fees and the money is, today, in an escrow account, in trust, for Deborah Bradley's "defense" in a criminal case.

It is held "safely" for her, when needed and "if" someone would find "that kid" and "bring her here", the $100,000 would be "paid." By being able to prove that $100,000 can be produced, those who claimed that a reward exists are legally safe from fraudulently promoting a "reward money."

Still following the money?

$250,000 sits in escrow, waiting...

along with the promise of movie deals, book deals, "exclusives" and so on.

Question for Deborah Bradley to consider:

Is Deborah Bradley worth more money to her attorney free, or under arrest?

No arrest means no defense.

No need for defense means no money for a defense attorney.

Deborah Bradley is worth more arrested than she is walking free.

Deborah Bradley is worth more in a long, drawn out trial, including the pre trial motions, and the constant HLN round the clock coverage.

Deborah Bradley should carefully consider these things, as she listen to the advisors who have talked her out of interviews, searching, cooperation, interviewing the boys, and telling police what really happened to Lisa on that fateful night. Those who have sabotaged a near confession do so in order to profit from the case. If the case goes cold, given America's hatred of Deborah Bradley, she is not worth as much money as she would be in a Casey-like circus trial.

Deborah Bradley should carefully consider that she is worth more under arrest, to her "team" than she is if the case simply goes cold.

America does not feel sympathy for Deborah Bradley. Therefore, if Deborah Bradley can't be sold to the American people as a sympathetic mother, she will have to be sold as a villain. This may include Deborah in handcuffs.

Susan Murphy Milano is a staff member of the Institute for Relational Harm Reduction and Public Pathology Education as a educator and specialist with intimate partner violence prevention strategies directing prevention for high risk situations and cases.
A national trainer to law enforcement, training officers, prosecutors, judges, legislators, social service providers, healthcare professionals, victim advocates and the faith based community. In partnership with Management Resources Ltd. of New York addressing prevention and solutions within the community to the workplace.
Online contributions: Forbes : Crime, She Writes providing commentary about the hottest topics on crime, justice, and law from a woman’s perspective, as well as Time's Up! a blog which searches for solutions (SOS) for victims of crime.
Radio Shows: Susan is the host of The Susan Murphy Milano Show, "Time's Up!" . She is a regular contributor to the nationally syndicated "The Roth Show" with Dr Laurie Roth and a co-host on Crime Wire.

Books: Time's Up: A Guide on How to Leave and Survive Abusive and Stalking Relationships,Moving out, Moving on, and Defending Out Lives.


Thursday, September 8, 2011

Intimate Partner Homicide: The Writing is on the Wall

Statement Analysis plays an important role in crime. It is an accurate process by which a trained analyst explains language either verbal or written to determine truthfulness, deception and hidden information a person with direct knowledge uses when attempting to disarm others as to their involvement in a crime.

I refer to statement analysis as the art of unconscious vomiting of the truth. In cases of intimate partner homicide it goes to the deception of the truth.

Earlier today on The Roth Show, Peter Hyatt, Investigator and Statement Analysis Expert discussed his work regarding cases where husbands whose wives "suddenly vanish" play a critical role when they immediately hide behind a lawyer instead of helping in an investigation. After all this is their wife and mother of their children, yet when a person flat out refuses to cooperate it is deception.

We discussed the case of missing New Jersey mother Randy Amanda Lehrer, last seen on Friday, August 12, 2011. His deception in Randy's case begins with calling her place of employment and telling them "she returned to her native Canada to take care of her sick mother." The author of the statement is being deceptive which is one example of statement analysis. Like Pinocchio, Steven Acnua (the husband) was caught in a major lie.

The case of missing mother Susan Cox Powell who vanished on December 6, 2009, from Salt Lake City, Utah goes towards Josh Powell's use of words and sentences during media interviews the most recent when he and his father are interviewed on ABC's Night Line.

To listen to the re-broadcast of The Roth Show click the link below:


I know that when Walt Disney created the Pinocchio character he had no idea it could be applied to statement analysis, but it fits perfectly.

Every husband whose wife and mother to their children "suddenly" vanishes where they were the last known person to have contact with them are pathetic cowards. Those involved in intimate partner homicide are Pinocchio's minus a conscious and heart.

Over time their puppet like mentality, words and predictable actions will be the key to their own permanent jail cell.

In statement analysis, the writing is on the wall!

Jounalist Isabelle Zehnder has covered this case from the beginning wrote an excellent article on the case: http://www.examiner.com/missing-persons-in-national/would-susan-cox-powell-run-off-with-a-man-emotionally-torment-friends-family

Information on the case of missing mom:

Randy Lehre is 5'2", 145 lbs with a tattoo on her shoulder that says "laugh now, cry later"

The mother of a 10-month-child, Lehrer, 32, is 5 foot 2, weighs 145 pounds, has brown hair and brown eyes, and is of fair complexion. She has a tattoo on her right shoulder that reads “Laugh Now Cry Later.” Lehrer was lasted seen in public August 12 leaving her job at Tommy’s Restaurant on Central Avenue in Jersey City.

Jersey City Police Detective Cesar Camacho, is leading the investigation into Lehrer’s disappearance. Investigator Charles Hannon has put up a $3,000 reward for information leading to finding Lehrer. Anyone with information regarding Lehrer’s disappearance call 201-547 5427.

Jersey City community expanding the search to Sea Side Heights where Amanda was a frequent visitor. If you would like to join a team, or post fliers please contact us via facebook.

To keep up on the cases of intimate partner violence and missing persons visit www.websleuths.com

Susan Murphy Milano is a staff member of the Institute for Relational Harm Reduction and Public Pathology Education. She is a specialist with intimate partner violence prevention strategies and high risk cases and available for personal consultations through the Institute. She is also part of the team at Management Resources Limited of New York.

Susan is the author of "Time's Up: A Guide on How to Leave and Survive Abusive and Stalking Relationships,"Moving out, Moving on, and Defending Out Lives. Susan is the host of The Susan Murphy Milano Show, "Time'sUp!" . She is a regular contributor to the nationally syndicated "The Roth Show" with Dr Laurie Roth and a co-host on Crime Wire.

If you would like to schedule Susan Murphy Milano for interviews, please contact: ImaginePublicity PO BOX 14946 Surfside Beach, SC 29587 Phone: 843.808.0859 email- contact@imaginepublicity.com

Wednesday, April 16, 2008

Drew Peterson: Camp Marshmallow: Day # 168



Today, marks one hundred and sixty-eight days since the loving Mother and wife of former Bolingbrook seasoned Veteran crime fighter vanished.

On day, one hundred and sixty three, the country watched as Mr. Peterson and his legal marshmallow roaster made an appearance on Larry King. A well rehearsed and scripted show was no surprise. The public relations team did an excellent job with Mr. Peterson.
Coaching pre-scripted and rehearsed responses. Did you notice how Mr. Peterson spoke about Stacy in the present tense? As if she were just around the corner? Or how the public relations team coached Mr. Peterson to focus on negative comments. (by the way that is a classic offender by the text book response). Or, Mr. Peterson's other responses during most of the interview
are not unqiue to "serial offenders" in abusive relationships.

I suspect the legal roaster team thought long and hard when Mr. Peterson responded to a question about his current wife saying "Stacy loves male attention. She could be dancing someplace". Well, that shows compassion for the mother of ones children, doesn't it? And what does that really say about the character of Mr. Peterson?

And what about Larry King? Where were the important questions? Or did he too, agree for the love of ratings, to follow a script?

Questions no one seems to be asking as an example:

Mr. Peterson when is the last time you saw Stacy alive and what were you doing?

Mr. Peterson can you provide a time line for yourself on October 28, 29, 2008?

Mr. Peterson you stated that Stacy left with $25,000 in cash and a red bikini. How did Stacy leave? By a cab, Did someone pick her up? Did she call a limo service? Did she drive herself? If she drove herself she could not have gotten very far, her gas tank was nearly empty, wasn't it? The $25,000 was that in colored monopoly money from the board game or real cash? Was the money all in one hundred dollar bills?

Mr. Peterson what about her purse? Twenty-Five Thousand dollars does not all fit into a wallet, or does it? She didn't take her purse and credit cards, what do you make of that?

If you know she left with money and a bikini what time was that?

What were you doing at the time she took off? Where were the children?

Stacy did all the grocery shopping, didn't she run to the store prior to leaving for her "trip" to pick up baby diapers?

Why did you have the neighbor (who you indicate you do not like) suddenly want to watch the children? Where did you have to go in such a hurry? Didn't you also meet the stepbrother at around that time?

Why would a "troubled" person make up any kind of story about you?

Why did you ask Rick Mims to pick up Stacy's car at the airport?

Where were you went Cassandra made contact with you? Were you home? Out and about? What?

You met Thomas Morphey within twenty fours hours of Stacy vanishing, when did you call him the night before, that day. Was the meeting planned well before just to see one another?

Your so insistent that Stacy is with someone or now as you stated she could be dancing someplace, have you gone out and searched for her at various locations you think she might be?

This private investigator you hired, what exactly have you hired them for?

The investigator has had many months on this case, what have they turned up, so far?

Do they provide you with monthly reports of their progress? What have they said?

Mr. Peterson, the morning of the 28th of October, did you and Stacy have a fight or an argument? Weren't your children in the home at that time?

Mr. King and the producers failed to ask important questions. It would not have mattered if Mr. Peterson & company walked off the show.

The right thing would have been to seek the truth and that just did not happen.

That in and of itself is the tragedy!
Stacy is still missing. The website address is http://www.findstacypeterson.com
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...